I. am. back!
2 months of hiatus and here I am again. It's 'good' to know that some things just don't change in Singapore during the time I'm gone. Like....this funny ST Forum letter again! Another poor soul whinging over a few extra dollars that she'd paid. Puhleze, I've been conned by shrewd retailers and suffered more serious consequences (much more than this $6 heavenly injustice she's writing) but you don't see me bitching about it. I'd just sliced and diced the retailers into pieces let it go.Anyhow, here's the letter, from The Straits Times as usual.
Yonex racquet's sale price higher than original price
I BOUGHT a Yonex badminton racquet at Takashimaya World of Sports with a sale price tag $57.
After paying, I was curious to know the original price. So I peeled away the sale price tag. To my shock, I saw the original price of $51.
I saw another racquet with a sale price tag of $66. To confirm whether there was wrong tagging, I peeled the sale price tag and it revealed the original price of $49.
I approached the sale staff and was told that it could be due to the GST increase.
I was not convinced of the explanation as a 2 per cent increase does not justify the difference.
I was referred to another sales staff. This time, the explanation given was that World of Sport buys in bulk from Yonex and thus was able to sell at a lower price originally. However, the sale price was recommended by Yonex.
I felt that the explanation was not justifiable. If Yonex is able to sell at a lower price initially and if there is a need to increase price, why tag a sale on the price tag?
Goh Poh Kheng (Ms)
Source(url)
!-->!-->!-->!-->!--!-->!--!-->!--!-->!--!-->!--!-->!--!-->!--!-->!--!-->!--!--!-->!--!--!-->!--!--!-->!--!--!-->